This is a continuation of testing of the following macro lenses : Sony 90mm f/2.8 FE Macro Leica 100mm f/2.8 Apo Macro-Elmarit-R Zeiss 100mm f/2 Makro-Planar ZF Nikon 105mm f/2.8 Micro-Nikkor G VR Coastal Optical 60mm f/4 UV-VIS-IR Focus shift and LoCA in the Leica-R 100/2.8 Apo Macro I figured that the best way to… [Read More]
Bad copy of the CO 60/4?
This is a continuation of testing of the following macro lenses : Sony 90mm f/2.8 FE Macro Leica 100mm f/2.8 Apo Macro-Elmarit-R Zeiss 100mm f/2 Makro-Planar ZF Nikon 105mm f/2.8 Micro-Nikkor G VR Coastal Optical 60mm f/4 UV-VIS-IR Focus shift and LoCA in the Leica-R 100/2.8 Apo Macro Earlier I reported on more focus shift that… [Read More]
Off-axis MTF results with the Sony 90/2.8
This is a continuation in a discussion of spatial frequency response (SFR) and modulation transfer function (MTF) testing reproduciblity. The series starts here: Towards a reproducible MTF testing protocol This post is a continuation of the last one in this series: Off-axis MTF testing The thrust of that post was that moving the target rather… [Read More]
IR hills with a 400
I’ve struggled all day tring to get the code to handle the moving target SFR calculations to work, and with confusingly erratic results. So, instead of posting off-axis MTF50 results, I’ll show you a few images that I made last week with a Nikon 400/2.8 in front of my IR-modded a7RII.
Off-axis MTF testing
This is a continuation in a discussion of spatial frequency response (SFR) and modulation transfer function (MTF) testing reproduciblity. The series starts here: Towards a reproducible MTF testing protocol A reader suggested that I reconfigure my testing protocol to move the razor blade target rather than the camera. That approach has several advantages: The target… [Read More]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- …
- 380
- Next Page »