• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 II / Fujifilm GFX 100 II — deep shadow noise at 14 and 16 bit precision

Fujifilm GFX 100 II — deep shadow noise at 14 and 16 bit precision

October 6, 2023 JimK Leave a Comment

This is the sixteenth post in a series of tests of the Fujifilm GFX 100, Mark II. You can find all the posts in this series by going to the Categories pane in the right hand panel and clicking on “GFX 100 II”.

Yesterday, I looked at the difference between deep shadow noise at ISO 80 and ISO 100 with the Fuji GFX 100 II. Today I’m examining the visual appearance of deep shadow noise at ISO 80 with 14 and 16-bit precision.

For this test, I mounted a 110 mm f/2 Fuji GF lens on the GFX 100 II, put the camera on a RRS tripod and C1 head, turned AF-S on for the initial exposure, switched to manual focus, and set an exposure that by the camera’s metering system, was 6 stops down from normal. Amazingly, the camera focused with the EVF almost totally black.

The rest of the particulars:

  • ISO 80
  • IBIS off
  • 14 and 16 bit precision
  • f/5.6 at 1/30 second
  • EFCS
  • Single shot drive mode

Developed in Lightroom, with default settings except:

  • 5-stop Exposure move
  • Shadows +100
  • Blacks +37
  • Noise reduction turned off
  • Sharpening amount 20 (default is 40)
  • White balanced to the white text in Hunt’s book on color

Here is the whole frame at both precisions.

14 bit precision

 

16-bit precision

 

Some crops at about 200% magnification.

14 bit precision

 

16-bit precision

 

14 bit precision

 

16-bit precision

 

14 bit precision

 

16-bit precision

I could convince myself that the 16-bit crops are a bit smoother, but it’s not something that will affect real world image quality.

As in the previous post, there are color shifts in the deep shadows. Those are due to inadequate black point calibration in Lightroom. I used the default calibration for these images. Custom calibration could remove most, if not all of the differences.

GFX 100 II

← Fujifilm GFX 100 II — ISO 80 and 100 shadow noise, visuals Fujifilm GFX 100 II — ISOlessness at low ISO settings →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

December 2025
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Nov    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Thomas on GFX 100 II pixel shift
  • JimK on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Pieter Kers on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Stefan Feaux de Lacroix on Fujifilm GFX 100RF inclusive review
  • Lou Jost on Leica 280/4 Apo-Telyt R on GFX 50R in infrared
  • JimK on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • JimK on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Craig Stocks on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Tim Wilson on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Erik Kaffehr on Sharpness and aliasing, one more time

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.