the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / GFX 100 / Field curvature with the 110/2 and 120/4 GF lenses at close distances

Field curvature with the 110/2 and 120/4 GF lenses at close distances

August 27, 2021 JimK Leave a Comment

This is one in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX 100. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “GFX 100”. Since it’s more about the lenses than the camera, I’m also tagging it with the other Fuji GFX tags.

In the previous two posts, I looked at the microcontrast and sharpness of the Fujifilm 120 mm f/4 GF lens at minimum focusing distance (MFD) with and without two 18mm extension tubes. In this post I’m going to field curvature.

After a couple of false starts, I came up with a field curvature test for the 120 GF that will work at macro distances. The test is a variant on Roger Cicala’s tried and true Photoshop Find Edges test. I tried a bunch of natural targets, with unacceptable results, so I printed out a low-contrast modified checkerboard with an alignment line in the middle. I shot it at a slightly oblique angle at the minimum focusing distance (MFD) of the 120 GF macro.

Here’s the test setup:

Here is the result with the 120/4 wide open at minimum focusing distance (MFD), which is 1:2 magnification:

 

The moustache shape of the focal plane is evident. It looks like, for 1:2 flat field work, the worst place to focus the lens is in the center of the image. Stopping down improves the field flatness.

At MFD using two 18mm tubes:

The lens is so unsharp off axis with 36 mm of extension tubes that I can’t tell how flat the field is, but the moustache appears to be worse.

The 110/2 at MFD with two 18 mm tubes gets you to about 1:2 as well. But it’s not sharp off axis. Here’s what it looks like at f/4:

f/4

That’s as bad as the 120 with the two tubes.

Stopping down helps a bit:

f/8

Now we can see that there’s a lot of field curvature, with the focal plane becoming more distant as you go away from the lens axis.

GFX 100, GFX 100S, GFX 50S

← Fuji 120/4 GF LoCA at close distances Two ways to get to 1:2 with the GFX →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • Stefan on Swebo TC-1 OOBE

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.