• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 / Fuji 45-100/4 bokeh and out-of-focus performance

Fuji 45-100/4 bokeh and out-of-focus performance

February 23, 2020 JimK 2 Comments

I’ve had some questions about the bokeh of the Fujifilm 45-100 mm f/4. There are two aspects to bokeh.

  • The first is relatively simple: how do the far-out-of-focus point spread functions (PSFs) vary across the frame, and what it their nature? That’s what determines the bokeh characteristics of the background on a wide-open, close-range portrait.
  • The second is quite complex, by virtue of an additional dimension: how does the nature of the point spread function vary through the in-focus plane, and how does that vary across the frame?

We can look at the first question by making out of focus images of a point source at various places in the frame. For this test, I used an artificial star with a 100 um aperture, gelled to reduce some of the blueness of the LED. Target distance is about 7 meters, and the lens was focused to one meter.

Here is a one-quadrant composite at 45 mm and f/4 (the center of the frame is the upper-right blob) with the GFX 100:

Fuji 45-100/4 at 45 mm, lower left quadrant

There is some onion-layering. The good news is that we don’t get mechanical vignetting until the star is fairly far off-axis.

Here is a set at 100 mm:

Fuji 45-100/4 at 100 mm, lower left quadrant

Oops! I must have jostled the camera when making the exposure for the middle row on the far left. You can see more onion-ringing because the blobs are further out of focus at 100 mm.

I’m only going to look at the through-focus PSFs on axis. It’s pretty easy to set up the GFX 100 to do the through-focus captures, since it has focus bracketing. Here’s at set at 45 mm and f/4, with the step size set to 4. Left-to-right, top-to-bottom, in order of moving the object focus plane away from the camera.

 

Fuji 45-100/4 at 45 mm f/4

And here’s a set at 100 mm and f/4, with the same step size:

Fuji 45-100/4 at 100 mm f/4

What should these look like? Here’s a set with the Fuji 110/2 (with the focal plane on the far side of the subject); the 110/2 is known to have excellent bokeh:

Fuji 110/2 at f/4

There’s a lot less color in the 110 shots, and less variation within the PSF disc.

In case you’re interested, here is what a perfect, diffraction-limited lens on a near-continuous resolution sensor with the same pixel aperture as the GFX 100 looks like in green monochromatic light.

First, in focus:

Slightly out of focus:

More out of focus:

Still more out of focus:

 

And even more out of focus:

 

GFX 100, GFX 50S

← Fuji 45-100/4 corner sharpness and field curvature Fuji 45-100/4 and 110/2 bottle bokeh →

Comments

  1. Erik Kaffehr says

    February 24, 2020 at 6:30 am

    Hi Jim,

    Out of focus rendition is not one of my great interests, but it is very nice to see that we can see similar characteristics in your models to what we can see in your real lens PSF images. Great work and thanks for sharing!

    Thanks also good people, Jack, Marianne, Iliah, Brandon and all didn’t mention who constribute to good discussions. Nice to have a community of knowledgeable people, helping out when they can.

    Reply
    • Brandon Dube says

      February 25, 2020 at 1:25 pm

      You could do phase retrieval with the actual PSFs. There are a lot of challenges in data like this, notable:

      – bad Q (<< 1)
      – polychromatic
      – finite distances change the math a little bit and require more than the usual level of care about conjugation
      – unknown F/# (though calibrate-able)

      If Jim wanted to take a crack at it I could help, but it's probably circa ~70 hours of work to stand up phase retrieval for the first time and run it on such challenging data.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.