• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fujifilm GFX-50S Review

Fujifilm GFX-50S Review

March 24, 2017 JimK 73 Comments

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote a post about making a mistake and losing my place in the B&H line for the GFX. I said then that it would be a while before I reported on the camera. I was wrong. A GFX did the web equivalent of following me home, and I received one yesterday, a couple of weeks earlier than B&H was estimating when I still had my place in line there.

This will be the first post of the review. There will be permalinks to all of the other posts down at the bottom of this page, below the comments. In addition, there will be eventually be links to posts that answer some of the questions I have about the camera:

 

  • How does it handle?
  • Did they really get the ISOlessness right? I’m excited about this one; it seems like they’ve done the right thing and passed the digital gain off to the raw developer when the camera gets ISOless. [The answer turned out to be that they nailed it, IMHO]
  • How well does it work with H-series Hasselblad lenses? [It’s a mixed bag. Here. Here. Here. Here.]
  • How well do H-series Hasselblad lenses work with it? [ Fine with the focal plane shutter. Not at all with the leaf shutters.]
  • How well do full frame lenses work with it? Which lenses work well, and what are the limitations? 
  • What’s the user interface like? I know it’s like other Fuji cameras, but the last one of those I had was more than 10 years ago.
  • What raw processing happens in-camera? [Not much, as it turns out. That’s a good thing.]
  • What are the sharpness/aliasing trade-offs involved with Fuji’s small microlens system?
  • Is corner sharpness of adapted lenses adversely affected by the camera’s offset sensor cover glass? [Apparently not.]

Some things that I’m not particularly interested in, since they don’t affect my intended use of the camera:

  • Autofocus speed, tracking, etc
  • Performance of the native zoom lens

Feel free to add comments to this post requesting that I look into something I haven’t mentioned.

Here’s an apples to oranges comparison of my most-used camera these days, the Sony a7RII, and the GFX. The Sony has a rather large 50mm f/0.95 lens on it, plus a non-standard eye cup and a hotshoe-to-PC adapter. The GFX has a built-in PC connector, so it doesn’t need such an adapter.  The GFX has the optional tilt/swivel EVF adapter and the 63mm f/2.8 (50mm f/2.2ish FF equivalent) lens.

The GFX has the CaNikon-like LCD screen on the desk of the camera; the Sony lacks that (a serious omission, IMHO). Both cameras have locks on the shutter-speed top dial, but the Fuji locks work the way that I think they should: you push down once to unlock, and the dial stays unlocked until you push down again. The Sony has an unlockable exposure compensation dial, and the GFX has a lockable ISO dial. I’d much rather have the exposure compensation dial, although it’s easy to change that on the Fuji by pressing a top-deck button and spinning a wheel, a la Nikon. 

Both the Fuji body and the 63mm lens are remarkably light for their size. 

Here’e a look at the left side of the GFX with the finder tilted to an intermediate position between the extremes of horizontal and vertical. 

 

The EVF tilt/swivel adapter is a well-made, confidence-inspiring piece of kit, with locks for movement in each direction. It’s not small, however. Note the battery door on the left side of the camera, a design move that has incurred the ire of everyone who likes to use L-brackets.

 

 

GFX 50S

← Don’t use Lr/ACR histograms to judge raw file exposure Nikon 105 mm f/1.4 on Fuji GFX-50S →

Comments

  1. Geronimo says

    May 22, 2017 at 10:28 am

    I am interested to know how the (difficult) Leica M wide angle lenses could work in the GXF. Specially for black and white (if there is a color shift). I know this are not ideal lenses but still it would be usefull for some uses.

    Thank you

    Reply
    • JimK says

      May 22, 2017 at 10:36 am

      Which ones? WATE? 18 SE? 24 Elmar? They’re all gonna be bad except maybe for the WATE. The question is how bad.

      Reply
      • Geronimo says

        May 23, 2017 at 12:49 pm

        Yes Jim; I use a lot of the old symmetrical lenses (including the 21 super angulon or the 15 hollogon but also the 18SE or the 12 voightlander) with the Leica M Monochrom. I am wondering if the GXF would be as good (for a wide angle black and white square format)?

        Reply
        • Rudolf Klein says

          May 29, 2017 at 3:05 am

          No way. I think that below 35mm there is no possibility of using M lenses on the Fuji 33×44 sensor. Even on the M10 these wides have difficulties.

          Reply
          • JimK says

            May 29, 2017 at 7:51 am

            The WATE does OK.

            http://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/leica-wate-on-fujifilm-gfx-50s-16-21-mm/

            Reply
  2. David Mane says

    April 29, 2019 at 9:27 am

    I’d love to be wrong about this. I’m a photographer of 40 years experience and I’ve used a Hasselblad film camera and Phase One mainly and a Canon 5d for fast work. The Fuji GFX looked great, the Phase One is worn out so I went in and being careful I put a card in a new 5d and a GFX and shot the same thing in the shop. I put the images next to each other and I thought the 5d image kinda looked better. Thinking I must have messed it up I went back to the camera shop and was way more careful, tripod, same settings etc. At the best I can’t see much difference. I’ve decided I’ll wait for the 100mp model but if anyone wants to look at my test images and tell me I’m wrong I’d be very happy to hear why. I was really looking forward to getting the GFX.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX 50S: Reviews, Stop The Click Bait and Adapted Glass | Fuji Addict says:
    March 25, 2017 at 8:44 am

    […] The Last Word – Review Begins […]

    Reply
  2. Fuji GFX-50S questions says:
    March 25, 2017 at 2:46 pm

    […] This is the sixth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  3. Zony 55 on a7RII & Fuji 63 on GFX-50S says:
    March 27, 2017 at 3:19 pm

    […] This is the eighth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  4. Lightroom processing of Fujifilm GFX-50S/63mm images says:
    March 28, 2017 at 11:35 am

    […] This is the ninth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  5. a7RII/GFX comparisons with no demosacing says:
    March 28, 2017 at 2:41 pm

    […] This is the tenth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  6. Sony 90mm macro on the a7RII, Fuji 120mm macro on the GFX-50S says:
    March 29, 2017 at 9:18 am

    […] This is the eleventh in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  7. Sony 90mm macro on the a7RII, Fuji 120mm macro on the GFX-50S — corner says:
    March 29, 2017 at 9:29 am

    […] This is the twelfth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  8. Hasselblad HC 120 macro, Fuji 120mm macro on the GFX-50S says:
    March 29, 2017 at 4:39 pm

    […] This is the fourteenth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  9. Otus 85 on GFX, Otus 55 on a7RII — square images says:
    March 30, 2017 at 3:06 pm

    […] This is the fifteenth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  10. Visual shadow noise with GFX, D810, & a7RII says:
    April 1, 2017 at 12:52 pm

    […] This is the seventeenth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  11. Otus 55/1.4 on GFX says:
    April 1, 2017 at 3:25 pm

    […] This is the eighteenth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  12. Zeiss 135/2 Apo-Sonnar on GFX says:
    April 1, 2017 at 4:08 pm

    […] This is the nineteenth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  13. HC 120/4 macro & Fuji 120/4 macro on Fuji GFX says:
    April 2, 2017 at 12:30 pm

    […] This is the 20th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  14. Hasselblad 35/3.5 HC on GFX says:
    April 2, 2017 at 1:30 pm

    […] This is the 20th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  15. Hasselblad HC 50-110/3.5-4.5 @ 50 & 110 mm on Fuji GFX says:
    April 3, 2017 at 9:23 am

    […] This is the 23nd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  16. Hasselblad HC 150/3.2 on Fuji GFX says:
    April 3, 2017 at 3:48 pm

    […] This is the 24th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  17. Hasselblad HC 80/2.8 and HC 50-110/3.5-4.5 on Fuji GFX says:
    April 3, 2017 at 4:07 pm

    […] This is the 22nd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  18. Fujifilm GFX read noise and EDR says:
    April 5, 2017 at 3:39 pm

    […] This is the 27th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  19. Fuji 120/4 macro Focus shift and LoCA says:
    April 9, 2017 at 11:50 am

    […] This is the 28th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  20. Fuji 63/2.8 focus shift and LoCA says:
    April 11, 2017 at 12:54 pm

    […] This is the 29th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  21. a7RII & GFX on-axis sharpness w/ Otus 85 says:
    April 12, 2017 at 12:23 pm

    […] This is the 30th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  22. a7RII/Otus 55 vs GFX/Fuji 63 says:
    April 14, 2017 at 9:39 am

    […] This is the 31st in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  23. Fujifilm GFX AF accuracy says:
    April 15, 2017 at 4:35 pm

    […] This is the 32nd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  24. Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 AF accuracy says:
    April 16, 2017 at 10:39 am

    […] This is the 33nd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  25. Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 MF accuracy says:
    April 16, 2017 at 3:20 pm

    […] This is the 34th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  26. Fujifilm GFX with 63/2.8 MF accuracy says:
    April 18, 2017 at 7:22 am

    […] This is the 35th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  27. Fujifilm GFX with 63/2.8 wide-open MF says:
    April 18, 2017 at 1:13 pm

    […] This is the 36th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  28. Fujifilm GFX/63 focus instability says:
    April 18, 2017 at 4:40 pm

    […] This is the 37th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  29. Fujifilm GFX 50S focusing — summary to date says:
    April 19, 2017 at 1:49 pm

    […] This is the 39th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  30. Fujifilm GFX & Sony a7RII moire says:
    April 20, 2017 at 11:39 am

    […] This is the 40th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  31. GFX vs a7RII — visibility of improved IQ says:
    April 21, 2017 at 10:25 am

    […] This is the 41st in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  32. Fujifilm profiles for the GFX 50S says:
    April 22, 2017 at 10:40 am

    […] This is the 42nd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  33. Fujifilm profiles for the GFX 50S says:
    April 22, 2017 at 10:40 am

    […] This is the 42nd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  34. Coastal 60/4 UV-VIS-IR on Fuji GFX 50S says:
    April 22, 2017 at 4:55 pm

    […] This is the 43rd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  35. Fujifilm GFX 50S use experience says:
    April 23, 2017 at 11:18 am

    […] This is the 44th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  36. Mitigating lighting banding in GFX ES images says:
    April 24, 2017 at 9:16 am

    […] This is the 45th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  37. Fuji 120/4 Macro at 1:2 on GFX: LoCA and focus shift says:
    April 25, 2017 at 11:06 am

    […] This is the 46th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  38. Sigma ART 50/1.4 on Fujifilm GFX 50S says:
    April 25, 2017 at 8:57 pm

    […] This is the 47th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  39. Sigma ART 24/1.4 on Fujifilm GFX 50S says:
    April 26, 2017 at 9:39 am

    […] This is the 48th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  40. Zeiss 15/2.8 ZF.2 on Fujifilm GFX 50S says:
    April 26, 2017 at 9:44 am

    […] This is the 49th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  41. Zeiss 35/2 ZF.2 on Fujifilm GFX 50S says:
    April 26, 2017 at 4:23 pm

    […] This is the 50th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  42. Manually focusing the Fujifilm GFX 50S says:
    April 27, 2017 at 1:05 pm

    […] This is the 51st in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  43. Fujifill GFX 50S — summary says:
    May 8, 2017 at 10:08 am

    […] This is the 51st in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  44. Leica 280/4 Apo-R on Fujifilm GFX 50S says:
    May 10, 2017 at 2:31 pm

    […] This is the 51st in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  45. Zeiss 250/5.6 Superacromat in Fujifilm GFX 50S says:
    May 10, 2017 at 4:28 pm

    […] This is the 3rd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  46. Leica 135/3.4 Apo-Telyt-M on Fuji GFX 50S says:
    May 12, 2017 at 11:20 am

    […] This is the 55th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  47. Leica 90/2 Summicron-M ASPH on Fuji GFX 50S says:
    May 12, 2017 at 3:30 pm

    […] This is the 56th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  48. Two Leica R-mount 180s on Fujifilm GFX 50S says:
    May 13, 2017 at 8:49 am

    […] This is the 57th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  49. Really long adapted lenses on the Fujifilm GFX 50S says:
    May 13, 2017 at 9:39 am

    […] This is the 58th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  50. Leica WATE on Fujifilm GFX 50S @ 16 & 21 mm says:
    May 24, 2017 at 11:31 am

    […] This is the 58th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  51. Leica WATE & 18 mm SE on Fujifilm GFX 50S says:
    May 24, 2017 at 12:07 pm

    […] This is the 59th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  52. Fuji 23 on GFX, Batis 18 on a7RII — kickoff says:
    June 28, 2017 at 3:09 pm

    […] This is the 60th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  53. Fuji 23 on GFX, Batis 18 on a7RII — distortion says:
    June 28, 2017 at 4:50 pm

    […] This is the 61st in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  54. Fuji 23 on GFX, Nikon 14-24/2.8 on D810 says:
    June 30, 2017 at 11:24 am

    […] This is the 62nd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  55. Focus shift, LoCA, focus stability of Fuji 23/4 on GFX says:
    June 30, 2017 at 5:06 pm

    […] This is the 63rd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  56. AF accuracy of Fuji 23/4 on GFX says:
    July 1, 2017 at 10:24 am

    […] This is the 64th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  57. Focus shift & LoCA of Fuji 110/2 on GFX says:
    July 2, 2017 at 9:40 am

    […] This is the 64th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  58. Fuji 110/2 on GFX, Otus 84/1.4 on a7RII says:
    July 2, 2017 at 1:40 pm

    […] This is the 65th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  59. Fuji 120/4 AF performance on GFX 50S revisited says:
    July 4, 2017 at 11:27 am

    […] This is the 67th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  60. Fuji 23/4 AF performance on GFX — medium contrast target says:
    July 5, 2017 at 8:21 pm

    […] This is the 68th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  61. Zeiss 135/2 Apo Sonnar on GFX says:
    July 6, 2017 at 12:40 pm

    […] This is the 69th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  62. Fuji 110/2, 120/4, Zeiss 135/2 OOF PSFs says:
    July 9, 2017 at 5:45 pm

    […] This is the 70th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  63. IQ effects of Fuji 23/4 distortion corrections says:
    July 21, 2017 at 2:43 pm

    […] This is the 71st in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  64. Fuji 110/2 vs 120/4 on GFX 50S says:
    August 10, 2017 at 10:56 am

    […] This is the 71st in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  65. Focus shift Fuji 63/2.8 on GFX 50S, AF to MF mode says:
    August 10, 2017 at 2:46 pm

    […] This is the 72nd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.  […]

    Reply
  66. Otus 85 on GFX, Otus 55 on a7RII — square images says:
    June 17, 2018 at 8:10 am

    […] is the fifteenth in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right […]

    Reply
  67. Fujifilm GFX 50S shutter shock says:
    October 18, 2018 at 7:33 am

    […] This is the 54th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.