the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / GFX 100 / Leica 90/2 Apo-Summicron ASPH-M on GFX 50S

Leica 90/2 Apo-Summicron ASPH-M on GFX 50S

December 23, 2020 By JimK 2 Comments

The M-mount Leica 90 mm f/2 Apo-Summicron is a special lens. Almost as expensive as the Otus 85/1.4, it doesn’t quite measure up to the Zeiss lens in the standard lens quality metrics. But in spite of — probably because of — its optical deficiencies, it does a superb job of rendering some things. In fact, when I sold my M-mount bodies and lenses, it was the only M-mount lens I held on to.

Yesterday I received a M-mount to G-mount Kipon adapter that had been or order for months. Today I mounted the Apo-‘cron and checked coverage wide open. Here is the result, with Lightroom default settings.

3.5 feet

 

10 feet — ignore the dark line at the bottom; I didn’t aim high enough.

The captions are the subject distances. It’s not an internal focusing lens, so I thought it might do better at close focusing distances. Maybe it does, but not enough to make much difference.

It’ll be fine for square shots, and maybe OK for 4:5 aspect ratio ones, but not for 4:3.

Things improve a bit if you stop down, but the reason to use this lens is to use at between f/5.6 and f/2.

Ah, well. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

← IR images without demosaicing, revisted

Comments

  1. DanB says

    December 24, 2020 at 12:17 pm

    Jim – I have found your lens tests interesting, and they have saved me some time and money by knowing which lenses would not likely be useful for me with GFX cameras. A question for you – you have the GFX 50S and GFX100 but you’ve been testing virtually all adapted lenses with the 50S and not with the more demanding GX100. Is that because you are unlikely to use those lenses on the GFX100 for some reason (and if so what might be the reason)? i.e. usually one would think lens tests in general would be conducted on the more demanding camera. Thank you.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 24, 2020 at 1:03 pm

      The GFX 100 is not really more demanding of lenses than the GFX 50x, because of the microlenses employed in the GFX 50x. It just has less aliasing and finer pitch. My GFX 100 is working nearly full full time in my studio, and I don’t want to disassemble the rig if there is no good reason. This was a simple coverage test, so pixel pitch makes no difference.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2021
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Robert Frangioso on Why so few posts?
  • Ken on Noise reduction and downsampling
  • Robert Kuechle on Chronography video up
  • JimK on Leica 90/2 Apo-Summicron ASPH-M on GFX 50S
  • DanB on Leica 90/2 Apo-Summicron ASPH-M on GFX 50S
  • gideon on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?
  • JimK on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?
  • Gideon on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?
  • JimK on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?
  • Gideon on How fast is the Sony a7RIV silent shutter?

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.