the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / When iPad apps go bad

When iPad apps go bad

August 3, 2011 JimK Leave a Comment

I’ve complained before in this blog about the terrible reliability of the New York Times readers, both on the PC and the iPad platforms. I praised the Wall Street Journal for their great iPad reader.

That was then.

For the few weeks, neither the New York Times nor the Wall Street Journal iPad app worked at all. They launched, displayed a splash screen and maybe some of the first page, and then they crashed. I tried rebooting to no avail. It took uninstalling and reinstalling both apps to get reading again.

While it is unusual for both of my go-to news readers to quit simultaneously, it’s not out of the ordinary at all to have iPad apps fail to start or mysteriously abend. I’ve talked to other users, and their experience more or less parallels mine. If this kind of unreliability happened on a PC, I’d be up in arms, but the fact that the platform is an iPad somehow makes me more tolerant. Everybody else seems not to care much, either. You ask about flakey apps, and everyone has a story; you ask what they plan to do, and they just shrug their shoulders.

It ticks me off that when an iPad app fails, it just closes with no error message from the OS. At least with Windows, you get a hint of what happened and a place to start looking for a fix.

The price of applications has something to do with our tolerance for unreliability. Many iPod apps are free, and what you expect for nothing? The ones that aren’t free cost very little. The fact that you haven’t shelled out a couple of hundred bucks for an app has to make you more tolerant.

While the apps themselves are free, e-subscriptions to the NYT and WSJ cost a few hundred dollars a year, and the subscriptions aren’t worth much without apps to run them on. I would hope that newspapers with paid subscriptions would take the reliability of their iPad apps as seriously as Adobe does with Photoshop or Microsoft with Office (both of which have similar cost of ownership), but we’re a long way from that happy day.

 

The Bleeding Edge

← The cellphone’s impact on cameras Landscape Light →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Brian Olson on Fuji GFX 100S exposure strategy, M and A modes
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.