the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Does reducing a7RII ISO decrease AF accuracy?

Does reducing a7RII ISO decrease AF accuracy?

September 30, 2015 By JimK Leave a Comment

A reader asked the following:

…did you find that AF focusing in the dark conditions with a nominal ISO locked @ ISO100 works worse than ISO for example being way higher ?

Good question. Only one way to find out. Start with an a7RII and a Sony 90mm f/2.8 macro lens. Proceed as follows:

  • RRS L-plate on camera base.
  • RRS TVC-34 heavy-duty carbon fiber tripod.
  • Arca-Swiss C1 Cube head.
  • Landscape orientation.
  • No filter.
  • A single Fotodiox LED-200WA-56 daylight balanced variable-output flood, turned way down.
  • Manual exposure mode, with ISO set to 6400, f-stop set to f/2.8, shutter speed to 1/320 second.
  • Focusing using single shot autofocus, flexible spot mode with the smallest spot size. The focus point is a Siemens star on the target.
  • Drive set to single
  • EFCS on
  • Self-timer set to 2 seconds
  • OSS set to on. This turns on IBIS. This was an error, and probably caused the average values to be smaller and standard deviations to be larger than would have otherwise been the case.
  • Make 16 exposures with new focusing for each, triggered by a wired electronic release.
  • Turn the ISO to 3200.
  • Repeat exposure sequence.
  • Keep turning the ISO down a stop at a time until it gets to 100.
  • Develop in Lightroom 5.7.1 with standard settings, except, for Exposure.
  • ISO 6400 images get Exposure slider set to 0, ISO 3200 images get Exposure slider set to 1, ISO 1600 images get Exposure slider set to 2, ISO 800 images get Exposure slider set to 3, ISO 400 images get Exposure slider set to 4, ISO 200 images get Exposure slider set to 5, so do the ISO 100 images, since the Exposure slider doesn’t go any higher than 5.
  • Crop, export as TIFFs, analyze for horizontal edge MTF50 in Imatest.
  • Export the results to Excel, crunch the stats, and graph.

This is a test designed to stress the AF system. The lens is wide open. The light is not very bright. The spot size is set to small, so the AF system can’t do a lot of averaging.

The results:

af vs iso

The bold line is the average (aka mean, aka mu) values. The lighter lines are the average value plus and minus the standard deviations (aka sigma). If the statistics are Gaussian, about two thirds of the expected results will lie between the two pair of lighter lines.

You can see that the images that weren’t pushed at all in post are not quite as sharp as the ones that were pushed 1, 2, 3, and 4 stops.  There is a small falloff in sharpness for the 5-stop push, and a little more for the 5-stop push that should have been a 6-stop push (but Lr wouldn’t let me do that).

My conclusion is that one to five stop underexposures aren’t going to affect autofocus performance much. I might rerun this test with the light even dimmer (and OSS/IBIS off) to see if that makes a difference.

← Sony a7RII zebras 70-200’s: Nikon f/2.8, Sony f/4 @ 200mm →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2021
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Feb    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • KM on Format size and image quality
  • JimK on Sigma ART 24/1.4 on Fujifilm GFX 50S
  • Christopher on Sigma ART 24/1.4 on Fujifilm GFX 50S
  • JimK on PDAF banding in GFX 100 in-camera JPEGs
  • Antoine on PDAF banding in GFX 100 in-camera JPEGs
  • Rico Pfirstinger on GFX Natural Live View and raw file histograms
  • Maurin on Zeiss Batis 135 on Nikon Z7
  • JimK on Zeiss Batis 135 on Nikon Z7
  • Maurin on Zeiss Batis 135 on Nikon Z7
  • Scott Pilla on GFX Natural Live View and raw file histograms

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.