the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / 28/2.8 Elmarit-M color casts with a7R & a7RII

28/2.8 Elmarit-M color casts with a7R & a7RII

August 11, 2015 JimK 4 Comments

In this test, the Leica 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit-M ASPH proved to be about the most troublesome lens on the Sony a7R from the point of view of color casts. It has also proven to be among the worst lenses on a7x cameras for corner smear.

While I don’t expect the a7RII, with its Sony-regulation sensor stack, to be any better with corner smear than its predecessor, I do expect that it, by virtue of its spiffy new back-side illuminated (BSI) sensor, to be better at avoiding color casts.

So, I took this worst-case lens and made aperture series through an Expodisc at all whole f-stops. with the lens focused at infinity.

a7RII f/2.8
a7RII f/2.8
a7R f/2.8
a7R f/2.8

Big improvement. The yellow top is gone. So are the purple corners. Falloff is less.

a7RII f/4
a7RII f/4
a7R f/4
a7R f/4

a7RII illumination is evener. Casting is negligible.

a7RII f/5.6
a7RII f/5.6
a7R f/5.6
a7R f/5.6

More of same.

a7RII f/8
a7RII f/8
a7R f/8
a7R f/8

I think there’s a pattern here.

a7RII f/11
a7RII f/11

 

a7R f/11
a7R f/11

Yes, there is.

a7RII f/16
a7RII f/16
a7R f/16
a7R f/16

This is getting boring.

a7RII f/22
a7RII f/22
a7R f/22
a7R f/22

I’ll test a few more problem lenses, but this is looking very promising.

There’s something odd going on in the lower left corner of the a7R images at narrow apertures. Dirt on the disc?

 

 

The Last Word

← What’s the fastest shutter speed you should use with EFCS on the a7RII? 24/3.4 Elmar color casts with a7R & a7RII →

Comments

  1. David Braddon-Mitchell says

    August 11, 2015 at 4:05 pm

    Interesting.
    I wonder if there will be a little less vignetting on native lenses? And I wonder if that means that Adobe need to make new lens profiles…

    Reply
    • Jim says

      August 12, 2015 at 7:13 am

      No native lenses have the exit pupil that close to the focal plane, so yes, even without correction they’ll vignette less.

      With a dumb adapter, the camera, and thus Lr, has no way of telling what lens is attached.

      Reply
  2. Jason W says

    August 11, 2015 at 9:28 pm

    Strong evidence. I’d be interested to see if smearing is also reduced in the corners. Perhaps the same test with resolution targets and give an MTF comparison between the A7R and A7R II with the same Leica lens, assuming this lens demonstrated significant smearing in the corners on the A7R?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      August 12, 2015 at 6:25 am

      I don’t expect a reduction in corner smearing. I’ll be doing tests similar to those I did on the Kolari thin stack modification, not MTF tests.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.