• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / 5 medium telephotos on the a7II at f/5.6

5 medium telephotos on the a7II at f/5.6

March 8, 2015 JimK Leave a Comment

Before I get into posting the results of yesterday’s lens testing at f/5.6, I’d like to make a few more general remarks.

To review, here are the lenses under test:

  • Zeiss 85mm f/4 ZM (Leica M mount) Tele-Tessar.
  •  Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 Otus.
  • Leica 90mm f/2 Apo Summicron-M ASPH.
  • AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.4 G.
  • Tamron SP AF Di 90mm f/2.8 Macro.

Let’s look at the photograph of the lenses again:

_DSC0189

The Zeiss Tele-Tessar is at the top left. It’s the only lens wearing an adapter, so it’s even smaller than it looks in this picture.

My next observation is that the a7II’s focus peaking makes it easy to rank the lenses in sharpness without even tripping the shutter. All you have to do is observe which parts of the image get the red algae at which magnifications and sensitivity settings. The real images bear out my impressions from looking at the LCD screen, but it’s easier to see differences on the LCD screen. That might be something to keep in mind when you’re buying a lens at a camera store that will let you try before you buy.

OK, with that out of the way, lets look at 2:1 center crops for all the lenses at f/5.6:

 

Tele-Tessar
Tele-Tessar
Summicron
Summicron
Otus
Otus
Tamron
Tamron
Nikkor
Nikkor

There really isn’t much difference. I’d give the nod to the Otus, but it’s really close. With a higher-resolution sensor, and/or one with no AA filter, there would probably be a bigger difference — there certainly is when you look at the red algae in the camera’s LCD.

In the corner:

Tele-Tessar
Tele-Tessar
Summicron
Summicron
Otus
Otus
Tamron
Tamron
Nikkor
Nikkor

The Tamron is clearly the worst of the lot, followed by a quite-respectable performance from the Nikkor. Then comes the Tele-Tessar, looking really good, but without the contrast of either the Otus or the Leica lens. It’s a virtual tie for first.

The Last Word

← A bunch of medium telephotos on the a7II 5 medium telephotos on the a7II at f/8 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2025
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Hakan Yesil on Fujifilm 20-35/4 GF distortion
  • JimK on More Than Exposure: Understanding Total Light on the Sensor
  • Brandon on Adobe Super Resolution
  • Brandon on A Modest Proposal
  • Jeffrey Horton on More Than Exposure: Understanding Total Light on the Sensor
  • JimK on A Modest Proposal
  • Brandon on A Modest Proposal
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • DC wedding photographer on A Modest Proposal
  • NiceDays on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.