• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / An irreproducible result

An irreproducible result

December 19, 2013 JimK Leave a Comment

There’s been speculation on some of the photo boards that the Leica M240 color may have something to do with a thin, and therefore not particularly effective, IR filter. The thin filter is desirable to avoid sharpness difficulties at the corners of cameras where the back end of the lens is close to the sensor (my apologies for simplifying here).

I was doing some testing of the Coastal Optics 60mm f/4 and the Leica Summilux 50mm f/1.4 on the a7R and the M240 so I decided to add tests of the 50 with and without an IR-blocking filter. The one I chose also blocks UV, and says Leica 13417 on the edge.

Here’s the scene:

L1004490

I didn’t find any color changes with and without the filter. However, I found that the M240 images were significantly sharper and more contrasty when exposed through the IR/UV cut filter. I didn’t find much in the way of any kind of difference with the a7R.

There were some possible causes, stemming from the thinner filter in the M240:

  • UV and or IR light scattered by the lens and appearing as diffuse veiling flare.
  • UV and or IR light brought to a focus ahead of or behind the image plane

The differences were too large to be credible. I was refocusing for each aperture series, so maybe there was a focusing error. I checked a duplicate series, and it looked about the same.

This morning, I went out and tried to repeat the test, this time leaving the focus ring alone for the images with and without the IR filter. Now the results were virtually identical. I must have made two similar focusing mistakes in the first set of images.

There are some lessons here:

  • When testing, check and double check
  • If something feels wrong, check some more
  • This IR/UV-cut filter doesn’t change the focus point on this lens (can that be generalized? Not without more testing.)
  • It’s more difficult to get repeatable, accurate focusing with the M240 than with the a7R.
  • With normal sunlight illumination and natural landscape colors, there’s very little color shift in the M240 to IR contamination.

On to the testing I started out to do.

The Last Word

← Zeiss 35mm on a7R Coastal 60mm, Leica 50mm on a7R →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.