• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Another medium tele test — f/1.4

Another medium tele test — f/1.4

February 10, 2016 JimK 32 Comments

A while back, I tested a group of medium telephoto lenses on the Sony a7II. The lenses in the last test were:

  • Zeiss 85mm f/4 ZM (Leica M mount) Tele-Tessar.
  •  Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 Otus.
  • Leica 90mm f/2 Apo Summicron-M ASPH.
  • AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.4 G.
  • Tamron SP AF Di 90mm f/2.8 Macro.

The Otus and the ‘cron came out on top, with the little Zeiss Tele-Tessar getting the honorable mention award for its small size, low price, and excellent performance.

Today, I’m going to start posting the results of a new medium tele test. This one uses the a7RII body, so it will be a little harder on the lenses. The lenses are:

  • Zeiss 85mm f/1,8 Batis.
  •  Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 Otus.
  • Leica 90mm f/2 Apo Summicron-M ASPH.
  • AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.4 G.
  • Sony 90mm f/2.8 FE Macro.

The best way to navigate to the various portions of this test is to scroll to the bottom of this page — below the comments — and click on the pingbacks whose titles interest you.

I’m not going to use the scene where the camera is cocked so that the horizon runs from corner to corner. Some people have complained that it makes them queasy, and it’s not much of an advantage with lenses as long as the ones in this test.

The scene with the Batis at f/8:

_DSC6862-2

And with the Sony 90mm macro lens:

_DSC6832

I’ll show center and upper right corner crops at 300%, which is pretty intense magnification, especially considering the a7RII pixel pitch, but this way I’m sure that small differences will survive JPEG compression. I focused on the center and corner separately so as not to penalize the lenses for field curvature. I only focused wide open, though, so lenses that have significant focus shift upon stopping down will show the effects of that deficiency.

Tripod was a RRS carbon fiber one from their heaviest series. Head was the Arca Swiss Cube. I used a 5-second self timer delay. I also used EFCS, which will darken the upper part of the image at high shutter speeds and wide apertures, but I didn’t want to risk shutter shock at the lower shutter speeds. The images were all developed in Lightroom with default settings, except for using Daylight for the white point, and some corner exposure moves that I’ll explain as I go.

This post will deal with the f/1.4 images from the two lenses that can open that wide.

The center crops:

Otus
Otus
Nikkor
Nikkor

The Otus rendering is far superior.  Crisper. More contrasty. More believable. And missing that really ugly green and magenta fringing around the light part of the house on the mid-lower part of the left hand side and the green at the top of the piece of copper flashing above that. The Nikkor show less obvious color fringing throughout the foliage. This could be longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA).

The corner:

Otus
Otus
Nikkor
Nikkor

They’re both pretty dark because of the corner falloff that seems inevitable with such fast lenses, plus the EFCS being operated where you’d not normally use it. I will probably have to go back and double check the f/1.4 exposures with the mechanical shutter.

For now, I’ll give them both a two stop exposure boost:

Otus
Otus
Nikkor
Nikkor

The Otus doesn’t have nearly the contrast that it has in the center, but it’s really a pretty spectacular performance. The Nikkor is just plain soft, and suffers from purple fringing that could be LoCA. It’s not lateral chromatic aberration (LaCA), since that would occur mostly on tangential branches, not radial ones.

 

 

 

 

The Last Word

← Planning for long exposures Another medium tele test β€” f/2 →

Comments

  1. Bob says

    February 13, 2016 at 3:56 am

    The angry photographer is not going to be happy when he hears your comments about the otis. I look forward to his reply about the chromatic aberration. It is an interesting video of his and you might want to check out his youtube and offer an objective counter argument :). In short, he claims that chromatic aberration is the lens rendering things correctly and if you use 3D glasses, the photograph will “pop”. I don’t believe the lens renderings things correctly as you can photograph writing and you’ll get chromatic aberration. I believe it’s just different light frequencies travelling at different speeds. I would like to hear your thoughts.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Another medium tele test β€” f/2 | The Last Word says:
    February 10, 2016 at 3:18 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  2. Another medium tele test β€” f/2.8 | The Last Word says:
    February 10, 2016 at 3:42 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  3. Another medium tele test β€” f/4 | The Last Word says:
    February 10, 2016 at 3:57 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  4. nother medium tele test β€” summary | The Last Word says:
    February 10, 2016 at 4:17 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  5. Another medium tele test — LaCA | The Last Word says:
    February 12, 2016 at 11:44 am

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  6. Another medium tele test β€” LaCA with dcraw | The Last Word says:
    February 13, 2016 at 3:02 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  7. Another medium tele test β€” on-axis color fringing | The Last Word says:
    February 13, 2016 at 4:40 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  8. Another medium tele test β€” MTF50 | The Last Word says:
    February 14, 2016 at 10:49 am

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  9. Another medium tele test β€” bokeh coloration | The Last Word says:
    February 15, 2016 at 1:58 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  10. Another medium tele test β€” more on-axis color fringing | The Last Word says:
    February 15, 2016 at 3:12 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  11. For nerds only — LSFs | The Last Word says:
    February 16, 2016 at 9:33 am

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  12. Another medium tele test β€” direct LoCA measurement | The Last Word says:
    February 19, 2016 at 3:49 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  13. Another medium tele test β€” measuring focus shift | The Last Word says:
    February 20, 2016 at 11:20 am

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  14. Another medium tele test β€” Otus & Nikkor focus shift | The Last Word says:
    February 21, 2016 at 12:56 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  15. Another medium tele test β€” Batis and ‘cron focus shift | The Last Word says:
    February 23, 2016 at 9:06 am

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  16. Another medium tele test β€” Batis LoCA | The Last Word says:
    February 24, 2016 at 9:49 am

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  17. Another medium tele test β€” Summicron LoCA | The Last Word says:
    February 24, 2016 at 10:25 am

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  18. Another medium tele test β€” Otus & Nikon LoCA | The Last Word says:
    February 25, 2016 at 8:47 am

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  19. Another medium tele test β€” Sony LoCA | The Last Word says:
    February 25, 2016 at 1:36 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  20. Another medium tele test β€” Batis AF | The Last Word says:
    February 26, 2016 at 8:17 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  21. Another medium tele test β€” Batis PDAF | The Last Word says:
    February 27, 2016 at 4:43 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  22. Another medium tele test β€” Sony 90 macro PDAF | The Last Word says:
    February 28, 2016 at 2:03 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  23. Another medium tele test β€” Batis AF with a new focus target | The Last Word says:
    February 29, 2016 at 11:29 am

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  24. Another medium tele test β€” Batis AF vs MF | The Last Word says:
    March 2, 2016 at 2:23 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  25. Another medium tele test β€” Bokeh | The Last Word says:
    March 5, 2016 at 1:49 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  26. Another medium tele test β€” more bokeh | The Last Word says:
    March 6, 2016 at 2:52 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  27. Another medium tele test β€” seat of the pants color | The Last Word says:
    March 7, 2016 at 3:47 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  28. Another medium tele test β€” animated color | The Last Word says:
    March 8, 2016 at 1:41 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  29. Another medium tele test β€” color stats | The Last Word says:
    March 9, 2016 at 2:20 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  30. Another medium tele test β€” white balance | The Last Word says:
    March 9, 2016 at 2:54 pm

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  31. Another medium tele test β€” conclusion | The Last Word says:
    March 11, 2016 at 10:16 am

    […] The test starts here. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 Β· Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework Β· WordPress Β· Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.