• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Cambo AC-380 fine ratio geared focus

Cambo AC-380 fine ratio geared focus

June 4, 2021 JimK 1 Comment

I’ve been using the Cambo Actus and the HR Digaron 180/5.6 for a while. One of the things that has bothered me is how difficult it has been to focus critically. The standard focusing adjustment mechanism is just too coarse. Combo has a fix for that. Like most Cambo products, it comes at considerable cost, but in the spirit of “in for a penny, in for a pound”, I ordered the Cambo AC-380 fine ratio geared focus assembly.

It’s two concentric knobs driving the Cambo rail gearing. The inner, larger knob has the same ratio as the standard Cambo focusing knob, while the outer, smaller knob requires five times the motion to move the back standard the same distance.

It works great. You can focus coarsely with the inner knob just as you did with the standard focus assembly — actually better than that, since the knob is larger . Then you can use the outer knob to easily trim the focus.

Makes me wonder why we don’t see lenses with fine and coarse focusing rings.

The Last Word

← Fuji 80/1.7 LoCA and MTF50 on the GFX 100S, sample points Fuji GFX 100S focus bracketing doesn’t return to starting position reliably →

Comments

  1. Peter Figen says

    June 14, 2021 at 7:55 pm

    Jim – I have at least one lens that does have three levels of coarseness to the manual focus function of the lens. That’d be the venerable Canon 200mm 1.8L. Now, it is focus by wire and I rarely am not using auto-focus with that lens, but the finest manual focus setting is way to fine for me.

    I would think that almost any of the focus rigs for cinema where a gearset is attached to the focusing collar you could easily vary the size of the drive gear, much like changing gears on a bicycle, to affect whatever focusing ratio desired.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2025
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • DC Wedding Photographer on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • DC wedding photographer on A Modest Proposal
  • NiceDays on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Christer Almqvist on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Paul R on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • JimK on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Jack Hogan on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Jack Hogan on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Štěpán Kaňa on A Modest Proposal
  • John Vickers on Mitigating lighting banding in GFX ES images

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.