the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / ETTR and ISO settings

ETTR and ISO settings

February 24, 2013 JimK 1 Comment

Over the previous 16 posts, plus the work that I‘ve done on expose-to-the-right (ETTR) (you can see it here), I’ve demonstrated – to myself, at least – several things:

  • ETTR can produce low noise results when employed at or near the base ISO of the camera.
  • It’s possible to mess with the camera settings, particularly the in-camera white balance, and obtain credible approximations to the actual raw histogram, allowing ETTR with some precision.

On the five cameras I’ve tested (the Nikon D4 and D800E, the Leica M9, the Sony NEX-7 and RX-1), there are small to zero (to negative, in the case of very high ISO settings) gains in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to be had by cranking up the ISO setting in the camera over its base level. Thus, ETTR is only an effective way to improve the SNR in the final image if you leave the in-camera ISO setting at the base level.

Unfortunately, there are many photographic situations where ETTR at base ISO produces unacceptable f-stops or shutter speeds. Dim light, camera or subject motion, depth-of-field considerations, and other practicalities conspire to keep the photographer from getting enough photons to the sensor. What’s the best strategy in that all-too-common circumstance? There are two poles.

The first is to set an acceptable combination of f-stop and shutter speed, then crank up the ISO to keep the histogram on the right. This has the advantage of allowing the photographer to use the same technique regardless of the lighting level, but it has some disadvantages.

  • The sacrifice of headroom and margin for error with no gain in image quality.
  • Slower, more fiddly exposure calculations (trial exposures, spotmetering, etc.) when they’re not necessary.

The opposite approach is to leave the ISO setting in the camera at base ISO, and when it’s impractical to expose to the right, just underexpose and fix things in your favorite raw development program. This also has disadvantages:

  • The preview image may be too dark to see.
  • In the case of cameras with electronic viewfinders, the finder may be useless, or nearly so.
  • The photographer may be unaware of how far underexposed the shot is, and not know if acceptable results can be obtained in post=processing.
  • The SNR may be slightly short of optimum (this is the least significant problem, and the effects may be so small that it’s unreasonable to consider it a problem at all).

As is true with most things in life, the extreme approaches are not the best ones. I’m sure there are many middle-ground solutions that will work well. In the next post, I will explore a possible centrist solution.

The Last Word

← ETTR — Just crank up the ISO? Part 16 A possible ETTR exposure algorithm →

Trackbacks

  1. M9 Colors at Night — Best Way to Shoot High ISO? - Seite 6 - Leica User Forum says:
    July 31, 2013 at 12:54 pm

    […] pictures you don't take. Here is a more complete description of the ways to use this technique: ETTR and ISO settings | The Last Word […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • Sarmed Mirza on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • lancej on Two ways to improve the Q2 handling
  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.