the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Evaluating profile/converter luminance nonlinearities

Evaluating profile/converter luminance nonlinearities

January 23, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

This is the 22nd in a series of posts on color reproduction. The series starts here.

Some profiles and the default settings of some raw converters have nonlinearities built into them. A case in point is Lightroom process version 2012 and the Adobe Standard profile, which together apply nonlinearities separately to the RGB planes, resulting in deviations from accurate luminance values not only for the gray patches on the Macbeth chart, but luminance and chrominance differences from ideal for the other patches.

Yesterday I showed you a slew of metrics based upon an exposure made by a Sony a7RII of the Macbeth chart under 3200K illuminant supplied by a pair of Westcott LED panels, and converted to Adobe RGB by Lightroom using the Adobe Standard profile with default settings except that the image was white balanced to the third gray patch from the left. Thus Lr did the adaptation to the D65 white point of Adobe RGB, using a proprietary method. The reference was a simulation of the Macbeth chart which was lit by a 3200K black body radiator.

I showed one way of looking at the luminance variations of the six gray patches yesterday:

a7RII Lr CC Adobe Standard 3200K Ill 3200K Ref Bradford18

I cleaned that up so that the origin is at [0,0], and we get this:

a7RII Lr CC Adobe Standard 3200K Ill 3200K Ref Bradford18

Now let’s look at the same dat a few different ways.

Instead of looking at L*, we could look at the linear equivalent, Y.

a7RII Lr CC Adobe Standard 3200K Ill 3200K Ref Bradford19

Everything’s crammed down at the low end, and it’s hard to see exactly how the line deviates from linear.

What if we plot the ratio of the measured Y to the reference Y on the y axis:

a7RII Lr CC Adobe Standard 3200K Ill 3200K Ref Bradford20

We can see the errors clearly, but it’s not obvious — at least to me — that this is a contrast-enhancing curve.

Photographers are, or at least used to be, facile at working with density. Converting the Y values to density gives the following:

a7RII Lr CC Adobe Standard 3200K Ill 3200K Ref Bradford21

Note that the white point is now the origin, not the black point. That’s how density works. Is that confusing?

Since density is a logarithmic measure, we can get the equivalent of our Y ratio curve by subtracting the reference density from the measured density:

a7RII Lr CC Adobe Standard 3200K Ill 3200K Ref Bradford22

Is that better, or is it worse? I’m too close to it.

I think maybe the best thing to do is to go back to L*, and add a linear line for reference:

a7RII Lr CC Adobe Standard 3200K Ill 3200K Ref Bradford19

Comments are welcome.

The Last Word

← Metrics for evaluating raw color conversions Macbeth chromaticity plots →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2023
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality
  • JimK on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • Darrel Crilley on Fuji 100-200/5.6 on GFX, Nikon 70-200/@2.8E, Apo-Sonnar 135 on Z7, revisited

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.