the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fujifilm GFX 50S focus stability with FW 1.11

Fujifilm GFX 50S focus stability with FW 1.11

August 8, 2017 By JimK Leave a Comment

Fuji came out with a new firmware image for the GFX. I downloaded it. But I had to disable the gateway antivirus in my firewall first, because it didn’t like the Fuji file:

[Added 8/10/17: The above is a screen grab of a portion of the log file of my firewall immediately after the download was blocked by the gateway anti virus software of that firewall. It does not mean, as one reader feared, that this site is infected with some kind of malware; it’s an image coming from this blog, not a warning from your anti-virus software.]

After I upgraded, I went out to do the test in the preceding post. With the Fuji 63/2.8, but not with the 32-64/4 zoom, I noticed something strange. I’d focus using the peaking method that I’ve previously advocated. Then I’d take a picture. When I went back to refocus for a second picture, I could see by the peaking pattern in the finder that the focus point had shifted. I could see this clearly at f/2.8 and f/4. It was almost invisible at f/5.6, and I could see no change at f/8 and f/11, which indicated to me that the focus point had not moved very far — the shift was increasingly covered up by DOF as I stopped down. 

This didn’t happen every time, but about one time out of 2 or 3. 

I went down to the test range and set up a slanted edge target which was fairly difficult to focus on with the GFX since it was too high in contrast for the camera’s overactive peaking. I made seven, five-shot series, focusing only on the first shot of each series, and leaving the focus ring alone for the next four shots. I made three sets exposures at f/4, and four sets at f/2.8. I measured the MTF50 with Imatest, and normalized each series to the average MTF50 for that series. 

Here’s what came out of that experiment:

You can see that six out of the seven series showed no focus shift. The fourth series showed a shift from the second to the third shot. 

Then I went upstairs and tried to repeat my findings this morning. I could not. The camera seemed to not shift focus after the first shot. I tried that 8 or nine times. 

At this point, I am once more in that state I usually get to when trying to get a handle on the GFX’s focus consistency: confused. The focus shift, when they do occur, seem to be small enough that they would go unnoticed in most circumstances, but large enough that they could play havoc with some critical work, like landscapes. And think what this could do to stitched landscapes when you focus once at the beginning of capture, and expect the focus point to stay put for the whole set of images. 

← Fuji 63/2.8 & 32-64/4 on GFX Fuji 110/2 vs 120/4 on GFX 50S →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2021
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Sony a7RIV with pixel-shift vs Fujifilm GFX 100
  • Ludwig Haskins on Sony a7RIV with pixel-shift vs Fujifilm GFX 100
  • Anthony New on Camera resolution and 4K viewing — summary
  • Ilya Zakharevich on Does repeated JPEG compression ruin images?
  • JimK on Does repeated JPEG compression ruin images?
  • JimK on Does repeated JPEG compression ruin images?
  • CarVac on Does repeated JPEG compression ruin images?
  • JimK on Detectability of visual signals below the noise
  • JimK on Does repeated JPEG compression ruin images?
  • Bill Claff on Detectability of visual signals below the noise

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.