the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / IR stitches in CPA show

IR stitches in CPA show

June 17, 2015 JimK 5 Comments

I’ve had a picture selected for the Center for Photographic Art Member’s Exhibition. I submitted ten images for the infrared freeform-stitched work that I did in a nearby oak grove a few month ago. My tentative title for the series is Los Robles.

I’ll show you all ten images today, and you can play juror. Tomorrow I’ll post the image the Richard Gadd picked.

Los Robles 1
Los Robles 1
Los Robles 2
Los Robles 2
Los Robles 3
Los Robles 3
Los Robles 4
Los Robles 4
Los Robles 5
Los Robles 5
Los Robles 6
Los Robles 6
Los Robles 7
Los Robles 7
Los Robles 8
Los Robles 8
Los Robles 9
Los Robles 9
Los Robles 10
Los Robles 10

 

The Last Word

← Synthetic slit scans with the a7S And the winner is… →

Comments

  1. Herb says

    June 17, 2015 at 10:36 am

    As a certified tree nut, I like #8 best

    Reply
  2. CarVac says

    June 17, 2015 at 3:41 pm

    What size are they displayed in (were they chosen between in)?

    That would probably affect my choice.

    For now, I like #3.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      June 17, 2015 at 5:05 pm

      Electronic images. 1920 px in the long direction, to the juror.

      For the show, framed prints, in my case 20 in in the long direction plus mat and frame.

      Reply
  3. Mike Frisino says

    June 17, 2015 at 4:43 pm

    congratulations Jim.
    My favorites are 1 (depth), 8 (striking) and 3 (mood) . Amongst those 3 , hard to pick 1, but as tree person, i would probably pick 8.

    Reply
  4. David says

    June 17, 2015 at 5:59 pm

    1, 5 or 8!
    Great series

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2023
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality
  • JimK on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.