the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Off-site backup creation

Off-site backup creation

December 24, 2016 Jim Kasson Leave a Comment

This post covers my current thoughts on off-site photographic backups. It should be understood in the context of this paper on backups in general. I should revise that page soon.

There are two basic approaches to off-site backups. One is to do local backups to portable media, and regularly carry that to a safe place. That is the approach I favor for my work. The other way of doing things is to use a cloud backup service. I have tried that several times, and never could make it work for me. The problems that I encountered included but were not limited to:

  • Slow upload speeds
  • Unavailability of physical media for disaster recovery.
  • Proprietary upload applications that broke things on my workstations. 
  • Proprietary upload applications that didn’t work reliably.
  • Worries about privacy in the event of the cloud company going out of business.
  • Inability to do trial restores

Here are links to some of my experiences with cloud backup:

Amazon Cloud

CrashPlan

AWS S3 and CloudFront

Dropbox Pro

S3 and GoodSync

 

For a long time, I used SATA disks for backup, and stored them in a safe deposit box. I still do that, but it hasn’t bee easy of late. In the USB2 era, with drives up to about 6 TB, things worked pretty well using USB2 disk docks. But when the drives went to 8 TB, and the only available USB docks changes to USB3 or USB-C, I ran into no end of problems. I tried many Seagate and HGST disks, and many USB3 docks. My test was a 7+ TB backup, followed by a week of updates. I’ve not recently found a drive/dock combination that can do that without a hitch. I’ve used docks from:

  • Plugable
  • Orico
  • Inateck
  • Cable Matters
  • StarTech

It is not clear that these docks use different chip sets, or different firmware.

What I’ve been doing recently is buying Seagate USB3 external disks. They don’t cost any more than the internal ones, which is strange since they are simply an internal drive in a box with a power supply and a USB to SATA adapter. They seem to be much more reliable than the docks, although they have not been perfect by any means. 

There is one serious drawback: they don’t fit in the small safe deposit boxes. 

If you pursue this route, you should know that the drives come formatted with exFAT, which causes Windows data transfers to be between a third to half the speed of the same drives formatted with NTFS. Fortunately, it’s easy to reformat the drives. Then things go pretty quickly:

 

 

 

The Last Word

← Bokeh, can you see? — greatly defocused images Shooting an event with the Sony a7RII →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • Sarmed Mirza on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • lancej on Two ways to improve the Q2 handling
  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.