the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Photography by curation

Photography by curation

May 20, 2019 JimK 2 Comments

I’ve spent much of  the last few days writing computer code for a new project, which like almost all my projects, is an outgrowth of an previous one. When I was working on the frozen flower pictures a few weeks ago, I noticed an interesting mistake. I had been making captures for stacking of some frozen flowers for a few hours, and some ice melted so that remaining started to float on the meltwater. That impacted the registration of the stacking software, and produced an unexpected result that was more appealing to me than a correctly-stacked one would have been.

 

As any artist with an experimental bent would have done, I began doing things to create stacking errors, learning what worked and what didn’t, and how to control the results. That was enjoyable and instructive. But I began to wish for more control over the stacking process and more automation of my experimenting. About a week ago, I decided to write my own stacking program, using a publically-available algorithm (and some code) described here:

  • S. Paul, I.S. Sevcenco, P. Agathoklis, Multi-exposure and Multi-focus image fusion in gradient domain
  • I.S. Sevcenco, P.J. Hampton, P. Agathoklis, A wavelet based method for image reconstruction from gradient data with applications, Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, November 2013

I learned a little bit about affine transforms (boy, I wish I’d taken Math 124 (linear algebra) when I was a Stanford undergrad) and coded a few simple ones calculated to get the stacking code to screw up. I threw some randomness into the transforms and had the computer crank out 30 results.

 

They’re not where I want them to be, but this is sufficiently encouraging that I’ll pursue it some more.

 

 

The Last Word

← Stepping down — epilog Trig can be beautiful →

Comments

  1. Robert says

    May 21, 2019 at 12:11 am

    Nice ones! Reminds me of a mistake I made once and since then I repeat it occasionally on purpose: Loaded panorama images of a rather greyish mountain slope with drak trees and rocks into stacker software; looked like a bit abstract B&W pencil drawing. You knew that it must be something like a mountain with trees, but then again not quite for sure.

    Reply
  2. Tex Andrews says

    May 21, 2019 at 7:06 am

    Huh. Funny thing, this. Years (Jeez, decades. OMG) ago, when I first took printmaking, I got interested in a form of this. With reduction woodblocks/linocuts, silkscreens, lithos, and other processes that required multiple passes to build up different colors, registration of course is the big deal. Naturally, I would mess this up on occasion. Equally naturally, I got quite interested in “mistakes”, to the point that I began to do things to generate them in ways I found interesting and that advanced some aesthetic purpose. Part of that derived from the tension between the aleatory and the predictable. Still very much in the air at the time, mid ’70’s, in art and classical music/jazz circles (with some experimental rock, a la Fripp and Eno thrown in).

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Brian Olson on Fuji GFX 100S exposure strategy, M and A modes
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.