the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Previsualization heresy, part 8

Previsualization heresy, part 8

June 19, 2012 JimK 2 Comments

In my previous post, I gave an example of previsualization gone wrong, drawn from the rich trove of similar experiences in my photographic history.

Today I’d like to show you  what can happen when previsualization takes a back seat to experimentation.

Several years ago, Charles Cramer (his web site is here) got interested in taking pictures of waves. In this project, he made over a thousand medium format digital captures on one weeklong trip to Hawaii, varying location, framing, and shutter speed. To create this image, Charlie found a nice arrangement of rocks, and maintained that position for 20-30 exposures, because, as he says, “Each resulting image (with the exception of the rocks) was completely different!  For the series I used exposure times of around 1/2 second, and waited until the wave started to recede.  It’s quite a lovely surprise to see each exposure on my camera LCD, as you never quite know how it’s going to look. I felt like the waves were performing for me, assuming different shapes and colors for each exposure.”

 

The Last Word

← Previsualization heresy, part 7 Previsualization heresy, part 9 →

Comments

  1. John says

    June 20, 2012 at 6:42 am

    Just a thought….in my view, planning to do experimentation is as much visualization as planning to do a specific shot. You always (usually) have an idea what you can get and want to see if what you “visualized” will actually happen…and/or…what conditions are required to get the result you “see”.

    BTW…I think per visualization is a redundant word….visualization more than fulfills the thought.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      June 20, 2012 at 10:44 am

      John, you raise two good points. Rather than dealing with them in replies to your comment, I’ll write posts on each. I think they’re both that important.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

July 2022
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Jun    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • pieter kers on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • George Simian on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • Christopher Thorpe on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • Eric Brody on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • Christer Almqvist on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • Mike Nelson Pedde on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • Alan on What’s the focal length of the Leica Q2 lens?
  • JimK on What’s the focal length of the Leica Q2 lens?
  • Jerry on What’s the focal length of the Leica Q2 lens?
  • JimK on Q2 Monochrom vs GFX 100S

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.