• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / X2D / Hasselblad X2D long-exposure noise, 4 & 5 stop pushes

Hasselblad X2D long-exposure noise, 4 & 5 stop pushes

November 17, 2022 JimK Leave a Comment

This is the 37th in a series of posts on the Hasselblad X2D 100C camera and the XCD lenses. You will be able to find all the posts in this series by looking at the righthand column on this page and finding the Category “X2D”.

In the last few posts I’ve been looking at the GFX 100S and X2D noise with long exposures. In the previous post, I showed you that Phocus is much better than Lightroom for heroic (9 stop!) pushes with the X2D. at base ISO.  Today we’ll look at some visual tests with 4 and 5 stop pushes, which should be enough for almost any situation where you’ll want to use base ISO and really long exposures.

Here’s the setup:

  • Hasselblad X2D 100C
  • Zeiss Otus 55 mm f/1.4 ZF.2 with Fotodiox F-to-X adapter
  • RRS carbon fiber legs, Arca Swiss C1 cube
  • ISO 64
  • 2-second shutter delay
  • f/16
  • 2 second exposure with no neutral density filter
  • 13 minute exposure with Hoya ND400 filter

That’s about a 4 stop underexposure for the whole scene, and a 5 stop underexposure for the Macbeth CC24 ColorChecker.

Developed in Lightroom as follows:

  • +4 and +5 EV Exposure push
  • No sharpening
  • No noise reduction
  • White balanced to second gray patch from the right.
  • Otherwise default settings (Camera Standard Profile)

Developed in Phocus with the following settings:

  • Standard profile
  • No sharpening
  • No noise reduction
  • No lens corrections
  • No keystone corrections
  • +2 EV Exposure push
  • White balanced to second gray patch from the right.

The Phocus images were given and additional +2EV and +3EV exposure push after they were exporrted to Lightroom.

2 seconds, Lightroom development

 

13 minutes, Lightroom development

 

2 seconds, Phocus development

 

13 minutes, Phocus development

All of the above have a four-stop push.

There is virtually no color shift in the blacks that I can see.

100% crops with a 4-stop push:

2 seconds, Lightroom development

 

13 minutes, Lightroom development

 

2 seconds, Phocus development

 

13 minute Phocus development

There are some subtle differences in those images, particularly in the color between the Phocus and the Lightroom images. The noise is slightly worse in the 13-minute images.

Same images with a five-stop push:

2 seconds, Lightroom development

 

13 minutes, Lightroom development

 

2 seconds, Phocus development

 

13 minutes, Phocus development

 

Again, expect for the color differences between Phocus and Lightroom, the images are quite similar.

My conclusion is that the differences for extreme pushes that I noted in the last post aren’t very important in the situations where I would expect most people to use 13 minute exposures at base ISO. This is, to me, a good thing, since the more I use Phocus, the less I like the way the program is designed. I do, however, like the colors it produces.

X2D

← Long exposure noise in X2D 100C, GFX 100x, part 4 Hasselblad X2D, GFX 100S long-exposure noise, 4.75 stop pushes →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

July 2025
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Jun    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • JimK on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • AVN on Of fidelity, photography, audio, and wine
  • Markus on In photography, and in life, work and joy can, and should, coexist
  • JimK on Fuji 120/4 GF at 1:1 with tubes — visuals
  • Christopher Roberton on Fuji 120/4 GF at 1:1 with tubes — visuals
  • Pieter Kers on Visualising lens aberrations — one at a time, Siemens Star
  • JimK on Visualizing aberrations — caveats
  • Stepan Kana on Visualizing aberrations — caveats
  • Hakan Yesil on Fujifilm 20-35/4 GF distortion

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.