• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / 35 mm f/1.8 Nikkor S focus shift

35 mm f/1.8 Nikkor S focus shift

October 24, 2018 JimK 2 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z7. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Nikon Z6/7”.

There have been reports of large amounts of focus shift with the 35 mm f/1.8 Nikkor S on the Nikon Z7. Several people have asked me to take a look. I finally got around to doing the tests, and here’s what I found.

I made 32 images at 55 cm at each aperture, starting wide open and proceeding in one-third stop steps until f/5.6. Plotted above as dots are the image field (sensor plane) focussed distances for all the samples for each of the Adobe RGB color planes. The difference between the three color planes is a measure of longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA). The distances are measured from the average of the green plane samples with the lens wide open. Backfocusing is indicated by positive numbers and front focus by negative ones. The heavy lines are the average of all 32 samples at each aperture, and the lighter ones are plus and minus one standard deviation away from that.

You can see that this lens has moderate LoCA wide open and that the LoCA diminished substantially by f/2.5.

To see the effect on photographs, it’s better to look at the diameters of the circles of confusion (CoCs) implied by the above displacements of the image plane.

The pixel pitch of the Z7 is a bit over 4  micrometers (um). This is not severe focus shift.

Looking at the big picture, I don’t see why even much greater focus shift would be a problem for the Z7 since it focuses at the taking aperture at all f-stops wider than f/6.3.

It is possible that the lens could have greater focus shift at longer subject distances. I don’t have a good way to test focus shift for wide lenses at other than close distances.

GFX 50S

← More Z7, a7RIII, and GFX color accuracy with Adobe profiles a7RIII, Z7, GFX color accuracy with Adobe Neutral profile →

Comments

  1. Herb Cunningham says

    October 24, 2018 at 1:29 pm

    Jim, to show my possible naivete’- I presume all the test are autofocus tests? If so, why do non action photos need auto focus? One of the reasons I quit Nikon some years ago was the calibrating, electronically, of the various lenses on the D800E’s that I had.
    Electronic screens show exactly what you are shooting with a manual lens, far as I know?
    So if you have say a good Zeiss or Voigtlander or Leica lens, if the EVF shows it in focus, problem solved, ?
    Am I missing something? It has been a long time since I was an engineer on the Apollo project, but unless Alzheimers is upon me, I don’t see the need for auto focus.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 24, 2018 at 3:19 pm

      The focus shift test is a manual focus test. Focus the lens on the target wide open, and measure the shift in the position of the focal plane as you stop down. I have done AF tests of the 24-70/4 Nikkor S, and you can find them here:

      https://blog.kasson.com/nikon-z6-7/af-s-and-afc-accuracy-24-70-4-nikkor-s-on-z7-at-70-mm/

      https://blog.kasson.com/nikon-z6-7/af-s-and-afc-accuracy-24-70-4-nikkor-s-on-z7-at-35-mm/

      If you focus at taking aperture, then focus shift is not a problem. If you focus wide open and stop down before making the exposure, it can be.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.