the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Vello/Commlite F-to-E adapter battery drain

Vello/Commlite F-to-E adapter battery drain

November 13, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

This is an afterthought to a series of posts on power consumption in the Sony a7RII. The more recent incarnation of the series starts here.

There have been some questions about the current draw of smart adapters on the a7RII. I happen to have a Vello LAE-SE-NFV4 Nikon F to Sony E adapter that I use to control the aperture of Nikon E-series lenses mounted on a7x cameras. This is a rebranded Commlite adapter. 

When I mounted the adapter and no lens, both the startup and the shutdown timing were affected. Here’s a distinctly abnormal shutdown:

vello-shutdown

The time base is 10 seconds per division. The camera was turned off at about division 0.4. The scanning stays active for more than 20 seconds, then the camera drops to a state where the current draw is in the 300 milliamp region for another 30 seconds before shutting down. When shutdown occurs, the currents are the same as with a dumb adapter or with a Sony native lens: 5.25 ma for a minute or two, followed by 1.34 ma for days (I assume in this case it is days; I can say for sure that it lasts at least 8 hours).

However, when I mounted a Nikon 85mm f/1.4 G lens to the Vello adapter and powered down the camera, the current dropped first to 8.27 ma, then, after a minute or two, to 4.23 ma. It stayed at 4.23 ms for at least 8 hours.

So, Vello users, be very careful about leaving your Nikon lenses and the adapter attached to the camera when you put it away. The battery will drain about three and a half times as fast as normal.

Users of other smart adapters might want to do their own testing.

Caveat: this adapter was purchased from Amazon in February of this year, and it still has the firmware with which it was shipped.

The adapter did draw more current when autofocusing than the Batis 85/1.8 native lens, but the effect was not unduly large. It’s hard to set up an experiment to make apples-to-apples measurements of this. This is not a review of the adapter, but you should know that the Batis 85 focuses much faster than the Nikon 85/Vello combination.

The Last Word

← Sony a6300 battery drain dynamics A book report — lessons learned →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2023
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« May    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Olaf on Nikon Z50 dark-field histograms
  • JimK on Nikon Z50 dark-field histograms
  • Paul on A book report: decisions, decisions
  • Olaf on Nikon Z50 dark-field histograms
  • JimK on Sigma ART 50/1.4 on Fujifilm GFX 50S
  • Simon on Sigma ART 50/1.4 on Fujifilm GFX 50S
  • Bob Foster on Hasselblad X2D firmware 2.0
  • JimK on UniWB on the X2D
  • Ad Dieleman on UniWB on the X2D
  • Christer Almqvist on Specularity, part 2

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.