the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a6300 battery drain dynamics

Sony a6300 battery drain dynamics

November 12, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

This is a coda to a series of posts on power consumption in the Sony a7RII. The more recent incarnation of the series starts here.

When I was testing the a7RII battery current, a reader wondered out loud if the a6300 scanned the senor faster than the a7RII in AF-C mode, since the frame rate is faster.

It doesn’t look that way.

LCD on, AF-S acquisition:

a6300-af-s

30 fps all the way.

LCD on, AF-C acquisition begun at division 2.5, ended at division 6.2 (division 0 is the left side of the grid):

a6300-af-c

Interesting. It acquires at 15 fps, but switches to 30 fps for continuous tracking.

A closer look at the 30 fps part:

a6300-af-c-50ms

There appears to be two modes, with one having a higher high-current duty cycle, and therefore a higher average current draw — than the other. I’m not sure how the camera decided how to switch between the two modes.

If we turn on the EVF, we can see the basic scan rate increase, just as in the a7RII. For the following image, I put my thumb over the finder at about horizontal division three:

a6300-lcd-to-evf

Taking a closer look with the EVF on, with a 50 msec per division timebase:

evf-50ms-a6300

The scan rate with the EVF on is 60 fps, but the current is slightly lower than scanning at 30 fps with the LCD on.

Looking at AF-S focus acquisition with the EVF on:

a6300-fa-afs-evf

We can see the camera switch from 60 fps to 15 fps for acquisition, the go back to 60 fps. I don’t understand the reason for that.

The same thing happens in AF-C mode. In AF-C mode, the frame rate for tracking is 60 fps.

By the way, when you shut down the a6300, the current drops to 5.25 ma for a minute or two, then drops to 1.34 ma. This is identical to the behavior of the a7RII.  In fact, the a6300 seems to consume about the same amount of power as the a7RII. From that, I surmise that much of the signal processing is accomplished with similar electronics, and that it takes no more energy to read out a certain number of pixels in live view from a larger sensor than it does to read out a similar number from a larger sensor.

Since the batteries are the same, the battery life ought to be about the same.

 

The Last Word

← Sony a7RII battery draw — summary Vello/Commlite F-to-E adapter battery drain →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • Sarmed Mirza on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • lancej on Two ways to improve the Q2 handling
  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.