the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Adobe RGB gamut limitations

Adobe RGB gamut limitations

September 1, 2012 By JimK Leave a Comment

In my last post, I made the assertion that, if you have a good printer, your printer can print colors you can’t represent in Adobe (1998) RGB, and therefore, you can’t see on a monitor with the Adobe RGB primaries.

I’d like to use this post to give some examples. In all the pictures to follow, I started with the profile of the printer/paper combination used for the example. I used Gamutvision to show what happens to the gamut if you convert images in that printer’s color space to Adobe RGB with relative colorimetric intent. Solid colors are successfully converted. The colors indicated by the wire-frame outlines are outside of the Adobe RGB gamut. The three dimensional graphs are in CIEL*a*b*, with the luminance axis running from bottom to top.

First, let’s look at Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper on an Epson 4900. The printer profile is Epson’s.

You can see that the Adobe RGB color space can’t represent some of the medium to dark blues and cyans that the printer can print. It also has trouble with some light yellows.

The Epson 4900 displays similar results when printing on Exhibition Fiber paper. This plot uses a profile that I made:

Matte papers don’t strain the Adobe displays nearly as much. Here’s what happens when you use an Epson 9800 and print on Hahnemühle Photo Rag:

There are just a few yellows, blues, and cyans that can’t be represented in Adobe RGB.

← Can you use a wide-gamut display? Design of a wide-gamut monitor →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2021
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Feb    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Maurin on Zeiss Batis 135 on Nikon Z7
  • JimK on Zeiss Batis 135 on Nikon Z7
  • Maurin on Zeiss Batis 135 on Nikon Z7
  • Scott Pilla on GFX Natural Live View and raw file histograms
  • Macro Guy on THoS: a NYT infinite loop
  • JimK on Sony 135 mm STF on GFX 50R
  • Alexander Häggström on Sony 135 mm STF on GFX 50R
  • Mike King on Metabones 1.26x Expander on GFX 100 with Otus 55
  • JimK on Diffraction and sensors
  • Barry Benowitz on Diffraction and sensors

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.