the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Does Sony a7RII LENR invoke spatial effects?

Does Sony a7RII LENR invoke spatial effects?

August 20, 2015 JimK 1 Comment

We saw in the previous post that the long exposure noise reduction (LENR) option in the Sony a7RII reduced the precision from 13 to 12 bits. We have previously seen that some 12-bit modes bring spatial filtering to the a7RII. Is LENR one of them?

Here’s the spectrum of a 1000×1000 sample from the center of a a7RII dark field image at ISO 3200 at a shutter speed of 0,8 second, with LENR on, but not used by the camera because it’s too fast.

p8 lenr not used fft

The vertical axis is the noise level in decibels with an arbitrary reference. The horizontal axis is frequency, with half the sampling frequency on the far right. A pure white noise spectrum would yield a ruler-flat straight line with an infinite number of samples, and a jagged one with fewer. Except for a very low frequency value for the horizontal component which is due to column noise, this is a textbook example.

Now let’s look at what happens with a 1 second exposure, which causes the LENR operation to take place:

p8 1 sec lenr fft

Not much difference. Let’s look at a 30 second exposure timed by the camera:

p8 30 sec lenr fft

Pretty much the same, too.

Now, a 30 second exposure in bulb mode, which we have seen to previously cause low pass filtering with LENR off. Are things different with LENR on?

p8 30 sec bulb lenr fft

No, they are not. This bulb exposure causes the high frequencies to be attenuated by about a decibel and a half compared to the low ones.

The Last Word

← Sony a7RII long exposure noise reduction Sony a7RII LENR at ISO 100 →

Comments

  1. JG says

    August 20, 2015 at 5:49 pm

    I’ve found your testing of Sony cameras over the past couple of years fascinating and your latest round with the A7RII is no exception.

    But as a practical matter, I’m not quite sure how to incorporate your findings into my workflow.

    To bring all of your conclusions re: long exposures with Sony cameras together, is it possible you can provide a “best practices” recommendation for a nighttime photographer (such as myself) who desires to achieve the best IQ possible when using these cameras?

    Do I: Shoot at base ISO in bulb mode and let the chips fall where they may, 12-bit files be damned?

    Bump the ISO and/or open-up the lens as necessary to keep the exposure length under 30 seconds, stacking multiple multiple exposures if necessary to achieve sufficient depth of field?

    Leave the LENR off, shoot multiple files and then blend them in Photoshop to keep noise in check?

    Some combination of the above or ???

    In any event, thank you for taking the time to do your testing and more importantly, thank you for sharing your results and conclusions.

    JG

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • Stefan on Swebo TC-1 OOBE

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.