• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fuji 120/4 Macro at 1:2 on GFX: LoCA and focus shift

Fuji 120/4 Macro at 1:2 on GFX: LoCA and focus shift

April 25, 2017 JimK 1 Comment

This is the 46th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.

I’ve been asked to run the same focus shift and longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA) tests that I did at 1 meter on the Fuji 120 mm f/4 macro lens for the Fujifilm GFX 50S, but at a closer subject distance. I went as close as the lens will focus, to a reproduction ratio of 1:2.

You can read up on the test protocol here.

Looking at the LoCA at f/4 through f/11:

The vertical axis is MTF50, measured in cycles per picture height (cy/ph). The horizontal axis is camera position shift in cm. The points on the left side of the graph are with the camera farther away from the subject than the points on the right. 

At f/4, the 120 macro is not as sharp as it is at 1 meter, especially in the blue channel, and has more LoCA. 

This is also not as good at at 1 meter, but is quite respectable.

Pretty close to the same as f/5.6.

Again, not quite up to the performance at 1 meter.

And now the focus shift in the green channel:

The focus shift looks to me to be a bit worse than at 1 meter as well. I’d foucs at f/4 for f/4, f/5.6 for f/5.6, and f/8 for both f/8 and f/11, and probably all narrower stops.

It looks like Fuji designed this lens to be at its best in other than it’s nearest focsuing distance. I think that’s the right decision, at least for the way that i intend to use the lens.

 

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Mitigating lighting banding in GFX ES images Sigma ART 50/1.4 on Fujifilm GFX 50S →

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Sony a7R2, Lens Testing, Review and Yosemite Time Lapse | Fuji Addict says:
    April 26, 2017 at 4:39 am

    […] The Last Word – Fuji 120/4 Macro at 1:2 on GFX: LoCA and focus shift […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.