the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fuji 120/4 macro focus shift and LoCA

Fuji 120/4 macro focus shift and LoCA

April 9, 2017 JimK 3 Comments

This is the 28th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.

A while back, I developed a protocol for measuring focus shift and longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA). I’ve improved it over the last year or so, but it’s still the same idea, as described here:

Towards a macro MTF test protocol

I should note that I could not find a version of dcraw that could read the GFX raw files, so I converted them to DNG using Adobe’s DNG converter.

I set up the Fujifilm GFX-50S on the Cognisys rail so that the lens was 1 meter from the razor blade target. 

 

At f/4, the MTF50 measured in cycles/picture height versus subject distance graph looks like this:

 

The reason this curve looks stair-steppy is that, for reasons that I don’t understand the camera made two exposures per position. Thus, you should look at the left side of the step if you want to look for focus shift with respect to the curves that follow. For those curves, the camera made one exposure per step, just as I was trying to do all along. I may redo these curves ni the future.  There isn’t much depth of field (DOF) at all, even though I tightened up on the step size for the f/4 image. There isn’t much LoCA, as the peak sharpness distance for all three raw color planes are about the same. 

And it’s so sharp! I’ve not seen that kind of sharpness from analyzing raw planes. But then again I’ve never looked at a camera with a pitch this large and so many pixels from top to bottom, plus a deliberately small microlens. I should mention that the aspect ratio of the GFX gives it a leg up in cycles/picture height versus a FF camera.

If we look at the Imatest analysis of the sharpest f/4 image demosaiced with the dcraw and the standard Imatest command string, we get an idea of what’s going on.

You can see that dcraw is doing a little sharpening in the demosaicing. Imatest still calls the image undersharpened by more than 20%. You can also see that there’s going to be a lot of aliasing with this lens on this camera; the MTF at Nyquist is about a quarter. The Imatest-estimated combined MTF50 of a bit over 2000 cy/ph is in line with the raw green channel measurement that I made with MTF Mapper, but that could easily be a coincidence, given the large number of differences between the two calculations.

If we look at Imatest’s take on the green raw channel, it looks like this:

The reason that the MTF curve looks so strange is that there are half as many pixels in each direction in any particular raw channel, and thus Nyquist drops be a factor of two. If you want to mentally divide the units of the horizontal axis by two, feel free to do so.

At f/5.6, things get even better:

It turns out that f/5.6 is the sharpest whole stop, with f/8 coming in second. I’ll just show you the rest in a group:

 

 

Really impressive!

If we plot the results for the green raw channel in the same graph, we can look at focus shift:

If you look at the average of the green curve, remember that it should be shifted half a step to the left. There is some focus shift, but it’s not bad. Still, you would do well to focus this lens at the taking aperture.

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Magical lenses? Fuji 63/2.8 focus shift and LoCA →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    April 10, 2017 at 12:30 am

    Very impressive, virtually no Longitudinal CA.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX 50S Aurora Extended and Fujinon GF 120 f4 R LM OIS WR Focus Shift Explored | Fuji Addict says:
    April 9, 2017 at 6:47 pm

    […] a lot of new Fujifilm GFX news today, but The Last Word tested for the Fujinon GF 120 f4 R LM OIS WR focus shift first reported by diglloyd’s and […]

    Reply
  2. Fuji 120/4 Macro at 1:2 on GFX: LoCA and focus shift says:
    April 25, 2017 at 11:06 am

    […] been asked to run the same focus shift and longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA) tests that I did at 1 meter on the Fuji 120 mm f/4 macro le…for the Fujifilm GFX 50S, but at a closer subject distance. I went as close as the lens will focus, […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • Stefan on Swebo TC-1 OOBE
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.