• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fujifilm GFX/63 focus instability

Fujifilm GFX/63 focus instability

April 18, 2017 JimK 7 Comments

This is the 37th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.

In the previous post, I showed you this aperture series for the Fuji 63 mm f/2.8 lens focused manually wide open and then stopped down in third-stop increments:

Aside from the so-far-unexplained glitch at f/5, it looks pretty much as you’d expect.

Here’s the same test done with two other series that I threw out:

What’s going on here? First, let’s look at the grey curve. It looks like it was focused the same place as the blue and orange curves at f/2.8, but the focus position started changing as I stopped down, only to get with the program at f/4.5, and then shift away again until depth of field saved the day.

Let’s talk a bit about how I stopped the lens down. You’ve got two choices on the GFX; you can use the aperture ring on the lens, or you can set that ring to “C” and use the front fingerwheel to select stops in third-stop increments. I had noticed the focus changing after I stopped down using the ring a couple of days ago, so yesterday and today I changed my methods, set the ring to “C” and stooped down using the finger wheel. I figured that I must have inadvertently touched the focusing ring when I stopped the lens down using the aperture ring.

Switching to the finger wheel for aperture control did not make the issue go away. It seems to be more basic than that.

Now let’s look at the yellow curve I’m using magnified view with low-sensitivity peaking, and with the target I used for this series, not only is it easy to see when you’re in focus, it’s easy to see if the focus shifts. So I think that the not-completely optimal focus at f/2.8 could have been the camera shifting focus after I focused, but before I tripped the shutter. In any event, it wan’t bang on for the f/2.8 shot. However, I see no way that, no matter where the camera was focused for each curve, that I could have gotten those four shapes unless the camera/lens system is changing focus distance during the series.

The Fuji 63 uses a focus-by-wire system, and the camera’s electronics are the only thing holding the focus distance constant over time.  These results, in conjunction with this earlier-posted series when the aperture didn’t change, are cause for worry:

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Fujifilm GFX with 63/2.8 wide-open MF Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 wide-open MF →

Comments

  1. Mark Kay says

    August 4, 2019 at 2:49 pm

    Can you provide some ideas on how this is happening at a mechanistic level?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 4, 2019 at 4:40 pm

      Not sure I understand the question. Do you mean what is happening mechanically? I can only guess.

      Reply
      • mark Kay says

        August 5, 2019 at 4:31 pm

        YEs… exactly…

        Reply
        • JimK says

          August 5, 2019 at 4:54 pm

          I’m guessing that for some reason, the camera is not providing a constant signal to the lens.

          Reply
  2. Martin Grega says

    January 9, 2023 at 11:03 pm

    hey JIM
    I’m having a similar issue with the 45-100mm.
    https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/66765884

    did you find any solution or explanation for your issue since then?
    cheers
    Martin

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 10, 2023 at 2:36 am

      No, but I’ve only observed it in testing. I use a tech camera or lenses with a mechanical helicoid when focus stability over time is required.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 wide-open MF says:
    April 18, 2017 at 4:41 pm

    […] At least there is no sign of the inability to consistently hold focus position that plagued the 63 mm lens. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.