the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fujifilm GFX/63 focus instability

Fujifilm GFX/63 focus instability

April 18, 2017 By JimK 1 Comment

This is the 37th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.

In the previous post, I showed you this aperture series for the Fuji 63 mm f/2.8 lens focused manually wide open and then stopped down in third-stop increments:

Aside from the so-far-unexplained glitch at f/5, it looks pretty much as you’d expect.

Here’s the same test done with two other series that I threw out:

What’s going on here? First, let’s look at the grey curve. It looks like it was focused the same place as the blue and orange curves at f/2.8, but the focus position started changing as I stopped down, only to get with the program at f/4.5, and then shift away again until depth of field saved the day.

Let’s talk a bit about how I stoped the lens down. You’ve got two choices on the GFX; you can use the aperture ring on the lens, or you can set that ring to “C” and use the front fingerwheel to select stps in third-stop increments. I had noticed the focus changing after I stopped down using the ring a couple of days ago, so yesterday and today I changed my methods, set the ring to “C” and stooped down using the finger wheel. I figured that I must have inadvertently touched the focusing ring when I stopped the lens down using the aperture ring. 

Switching to the finger wheel for aperture control did not make the issue go away. It seems to be more basic than that.

Now let’s look at the yellow curve I’m using magnified view with low-sensitivity peaking, and with the target I used for this series, not only is it easy to see when you’re in focus, it’s easy to see if the focus shifts. So I think that the not-completely optimal focus at f/2.8 could have been the camera shifting focus after I focused, but before I tripped the shutter. In any event, it wan’t bang on for the f/2.8 shot. However, I see no way that, no matter where the camera was focused for each curve, that I could have gotten those four shapes unless the camera/lens system is changing focus distance during the series. 

The Fuji 63 uses a focus-by-wire system, and the camera’s electronics are the only thing holding the focus distance constant over time.  These results, in conjunction with this earlier-posted series when the aperture didn’t change, are cause for worry:

← Fujifilm GFX with 63/2.8 wide-open MF Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 wide-open MF →

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 wide-open MF says:
    April 18, 2017 at 4:41 pm

    […] At least there is no sign of the inability to consistently hold focus position that plagued the 63 mm lens. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

February 2019
SMTWTFS
« Jan  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728 

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Take More Crappy Pictures in 2019!
  • Daniel on Take More Crappy Pictures in 2019!
  • Philip on Why we photograph
  • SE on A one-step UniWB procedure
  • SE on A one-step UniWB procedure
  • JimK on Simple decentering test
  • JimK on Simple decentering test
  • Daniel J. Zielinski on Simple decentering test
  • Daniel J. Zielinski on Simple decentering test
  • JimK on Simple decentering test

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.