the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Leica M9 read noise analysis

Leica M9 read noise analysis

November 2, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

I took a quick look at the Hasselblad H2D-39 a few days ago; that’s the only CCD camera for which I’ve analyzed the read noise. The H2D-39 cuts off the left half of the read noise histogram when making dark-field images, so it’s not ideal for these tests. The Leica M9 does not. In fact, unique among the cameras I’ve tested in the last couple of weeks, the black point changes with ISO setting, approximately doubling each time ISO does.

With no further ado, here are the read noise vs low pass filter size curves for the five whole-f-stop ISOs of the M9:

M9H

M9V

Now let’s see what they look like referred to the input of the pre-ADC gain stage:

M9sensorrefferedH

M0sensoreefferedV

The M9 read noise is much higher than it was for the CMOS cameras that I tested earlier. It looks like you shouldn’t ever use ISO 2500. But we knew that from earlier testing.

If the read noise were white and Gaussian, the sensor-referred plot would look like this:

M9Ideal

Here are the ratios of the two sets of actual curves to the ideal case:

M9RatioH

M9RatioV

The M9 low-frequency content of the read noise is good-to-average. There appears to be no significant bias towards either the vertical or the horizontal direction. However, the amount of read noise is extremely high, even if you stay away from ISO 2500.

The Last Word

← Nikon D800E dark field images Leica M9 dark field images →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

September 2023
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« Jul    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Erik on How fast is the GFX 100 II electronic shutter?
  • Edwin Shih on Fujifilm GFX 100 II: more on EDR vs shutter speed
  • UA on How fast is the GFX 100 II electronic shutter?
  • UA on Fujifilm GFX 100 II: more on EDR vs shutter speed
  • Matthias on How fast is the GFX 100 II electronic shutter?
  • Bek on Hasselblad X2D, GFX 100S shadow noise, visuals
  • Steven on FF equivalent focal lengths of Hasselblad XCD, Fuji GF lenses
  • JimK on Backing up photographic images
  • Jeff Wolford on Backing up photographic images
  • Barry Goyette on My lack of productivity

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.