the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7RII pushed bookcase images — ISO 12800 base

Sony a7RII pushed bookcase images — ISO 12800 base

August 13, 2015 JimK Leave a Comment

This is a continuation of the testing started here, but with a base ISO two stops higher.

For review, here is the test protocol.

I set the a7RII on a tripod with the Zony 35/2.8 FE lens attached, determined that a not-very-aggressively-ETTR’d exposure at ISO 12800 was f/8 at 1/125 second. Varying nothing but the ISO setting, I made five more exposures at ISO 6400, 3200, 1600, 800, and 400. I also made exposures at ISO 640 and 500 that aren’t in this post, but that I’ll tell you about later.

I developed the images in Lightroom CC 2015.1.1 with the Adobe Standard profile and default settings except for the same custom white balance for all the images which was obtained from the middle gray square on the Macbeth chart. Then I set the Exposure control on the ISO 400 image to an extra +5, the Exposure control on the ISO 800 image to an extra +4, the Exposure control on the ISO 1600 image to an extra +3, the Exposure control on the ISO 3200 image to an extra +2, the Exposure control on the ISO 6400 image to an extra +1, and didn’t adjust the Exposure of the ISO 12800 image.

 

ISO 12800
ISO 12800
ISO 6400
ISO 6400
ISO 3200
ISO 3200
ISO 1600
ISO 1600
ISO 800
ISO 800
ISO 400
ISO 400

The Adobe Standard profile isn’t designed with this kind of extreme pushes in mind, and some people have reported color shifts. Let’s take a look at the Macbeth card.

 

ISO 12800
ISO 12800
ISO 6400
ISO 6400
ISO 3200
ISO 3200
ISO 1600
ISO 1600
ISO 800
ISO 800
ISO 400
ISO 400

The color shifts look minor to me. In the next post I’ll look at noise

The Last Word

← Sony a7RII conversion gain visual changes Noise in Sony a7RII pushed bookcase images — base ISO 12800 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2022
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« May    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • pieter kers on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • George Simian on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • Christopher Thorpe on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • Eric Brody on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • Christer Almqvist on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • Mike Nelson Pedde on You’re an old photographer if you can remember…
  • Alan on What’s the focal length of the Leica Q2 lens?
  • JimK on What’s the focal length of the Leica Q2 lens?
  • Jerry on What’s the focal length of the Leica Q2 lens?
  • JimK on Q2 Monochrom vs GFX 100S

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.