This is part of a series about my experiences in publishing a book.The series starts here. In my last post, I reported on my worries that the captions and footers weren’t sufficiently legible in the Matchprint proofs. I finished reviewing the proofs, and dropped them by Jerry’s offices today. We talked about the captions. I… [Read More]
A book report — Matchprints & mechanicals
This is part of a series about my experiences in publishing a book.The series starts here. I met with Jerry Takigawa yesterday, and he showed me several things that Hemlock had provided: A complete mechanical proof of the book, with low resolution and inaccurate color. A mechanical proof of the dust cover, showing how the… [Read More]
Depth of Field summary — part 2
This is a continuation of a report on new ways to look at depth of field. The series starts here: A new way to look at depth of field The shape of the curves. Let’s take a closer look at the DOF curves for the simulated Otus lens focused at three meters that I showed… [Read More]
OOF LED test won’t detect tilt
A while back, I posted the following simple lens decentering test, using a out-of-focus LED: Simple decentering test There have been reports of this test not detecting lenses whose field curvature is not symmetric about the lens axis, but has a til component. There is no reason to think that the OOF LED test can… [Read More]
Depth of field summary — part 1
This is a continuation of a report on new ways to look at depth of field. The series starts here: A new way to look at depth of field I’ve been derelict in publishing a summary of all my work of depth of field. I apologize. The reason is that I find it difficult to… [Read More]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- …
- 380
- Next Page »